State revises ITAR on defense services

Posted

The Departments of State and Commerce are each issuing separate but complementary proposed rules 

  • this Department of State proposed rule to amend the definition of defense service and the USML, and
  • a separate Commerce proposed rule to implement its new ECRA authority by amending the U.S. person controls set forth in the Export Administration Regulations ansd clarifying the scope of BIS’s jurisdiction over certain U.S. person activities.

By publishing both rules simultaneously and seeking public comment on the proposed changes, DDTC and BIS hope to ensure awareness as to the distinct areas of coverage of U.S. person activities under their respective legal and regulatory authorities.

State Review of "defense services'

The State Departemnt's review of the definition of "defense service" in the ITAR  focused on identifying activities of U.S. persons that

  1. provide a critical military or intelligence advantage such that they warrant control under the ITAR and are activities that are not currently subject to the ITAR; or
  2. are controlled under the ITAR, but the current control language would benefit from additional clarity.

Following that review, the Department proposes a revised definition of defense service to better describe existing controls and the scope of activities

it proposes to regulate through the revised definition and also proposes certain additions to the United States Munitions List

Background

In considering what to designate as a defense article or defense service on the USML, the State Department primarily focuses on those articles or services that provide a critical military or intelligence advantage such that they warrant control under the ITAR.

During its recent review of defense services, DDTC identified certain (1) military, (2) cyber, and (3) intelligence services, furnished to foreign persons that are not currently controlled or which are controlled but for which the applicable control language could benefit from additional clarity.

New Definition of defense service

The Department now proposes a new definition of defense service, coupled with a detailed articulation of currently and newly controlled services on the USML, along with language that would provide the basis for the regulation of certain proposed new services as defense services.

Included in this proposal is specific language regarding the furnishing of intelligence-related assistance that is not directly related to a defense article to certain types of foreign persons (i.e., a foreign unit, force, or government) or their proxies or agents.

The Department assessed that these activities warrant and require control equivalent to those of intelligence-related defense articles since such assistance (including training or consulting) similarly furnishes a critical military or intelligence advantage to the foreign person.

Proposed Design and Structure of Amendments

  1. revising the list of regulated activities to include “assistance, including training or consulting, to foreign persons in the development (including, e.g., design), production (including, e.g., engineering and manufacture), assembly, testing, repair, maintenance, modification, disabling, degradation, destruction, operation, processing, use, or demilitarization of a defense article.”

it does not treat training to mean only direct instructional activity. The proposed addition would reaffirm that providing the tools or means of furnishing training to a foreign person so that the foreign person may conduct training in lieu of the regulated person is included in the control

As to the objective of the proposed additions to the USML, the Department determined  that certain intelligence activities that do not involve defense articles provide a critical military or intelligence advantage such that they warrant and require revised controls under the ITAR.

"Persons furnishing certain military assistance to foreign persons can cause local and regional instability in a manner equal to or greater than the supply of a tangible article or weapon to a foreign person end-user," the Departemnt notes.

 Catch and Release

The proposed amendments utilize a method of control sometimes known as “catch and release,” which functions to initially describe a broad range of activities as a “catch,” and then specifies certain limited carve-outs as a “release” from the “catch.”

As applied here, the catch- and-release design establishes that furnishing certain forms of listed assistance to a foreign person is controlled.

Included in the releases for both intelligence assistance  and military assistance  are activities performed by U.S. persons who have been drafted into the regular military forces of a foreign nation,   (This exclusion has been in ITAR since 1984.)

USML Amendments

The proposed USML Category IX(s)(3) describes defense services relating to military assistance and provides specified carve-outs.

Specifically, the proposed language controls persons furnishing assistance that creates, supports, or improves the organization or formation of foreign military or paramilitary forces.

Changinf the terminology from "regular and irregular" to "military or paramilitary" focers is intended to put illicit actors or unassuming persons on even clearer notice that providing training to create, support, or improve the military or paramilitary capabilities of any kind of unit or force, governmental or not, is a defense service requiring authorization.

Likewise, the creation of a separate entry separating the control text governing intelligence assistance from the control text describing military assistance is intended to provide clearer notice to the regulated community, that the ITAR regulates services related to intelligence activities, regardless of nexus to a defense article.

Including “training or consulting” in the text allows the Department to specifically and explicitly describe on the USML the conduct of U.S. persons (or foreign persons in the United States) who furnish any described defense service to enable a foreign government, unit, or force, or their proxy or agent, to conduct intelligence activities themselves.

Input Sought

The Department seeks input on the clarity and scope of the “for compensation” criterion as well as input on the six carve-outs or exclusions.

The proposed language would carve out six specific sets of activities from the proposed controls on intelligence assistance.

Three of the carve-outs to intelligence assistance activities are identical to the three military assistance activities carve- outs already found:

  • brokering activities,
  • U.S. persons drafted into regular military forces of a foreign nation, and carve-outs already found, and
  • training and advice entirely composed of general scientific, mathematical, or engineering principles commonly taught in schools, colleges, and universities.

The fourth carve-out related to intelligence assistance proposes to carve out information technology services that are "ordinarily provided to allow any business entity to operate internally as a modern business environment, without a sector-specific specialization."

The fifth carve-out makes clear that the ITAR does not interfere with an otherwise lawful activity of a U.S. local or federal law enforcement or intelligence agency.

The sixth carve-out  intends to avoid imposing a duplicative export licensing requirement for activitie already regulated or proposed for regulation under the ITAR or EAR to the destinations of concern.

 

International Traffic in Arms Regulations:

Revisions to Definition and Controls Related to Defense Services

Filed on: 07/25/2024 at 8:45 am 
Scheduled Pub. Date: 07/29/2024 
FR Document: 2024-16501

PDF 20 Pages (145 KB)
Permalink

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here